Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria Calculator

Select the items present:




Result :

What Is the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC)?

The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria, commonly known as PERC, is a validated clinical tool used by healthcare professionals to assess the likelihood of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients who are already considered to be at low risk. Pulmonary embolism is a serious condition caused by a blood clot that travels to the lungs, which can block blood flow and become life-threatening if not diagnosed and treated promptly.

In emergency departments and other clinical settings, many patients present with symptoms like shortness of breath, chest pain, or a fast heart rate. These symptoms can suggest a wide range of conditions, including pulmonary embolism. However, not every patient with these symptoms needs to undergo extensive testing. That’s where the PERC tool comes in—it helps clinicians determine if PE can be safely ruled out without further diagnostic procedures.

The PERC rule includes eight specific criteria. Each one is a "yes" or "no" question based on a patient’s age, vital signs, symptoms, and medical history. If the answer is “yes” to all eight criteria (meaning the patient meets all low-risk benchmarks), then the likelihood of a pulmonary embolism is extremely low, and additional testing may not be necessary.

By applying the PERC rule, healthcare providers can reduce the need for imaging studies such as CT pulmonary angiography or unnecessary blood tests like D-dimer, which can be costly and may expose patients to risks like radiation or contrast agents. This tool is particularly useful for improving the efficiency of emergency care, minimizing patient anxiety, and streamlining the diagnostic process.

It’s important to note that the PERC rule is only intended for use in patients who are already considered to have a low clinical probability of PE. It should not be used on its own without clinical judgment or in patients with a high pre-test probability of PE. When used appropriately, the PERC tool helps support safer and more effective patient care.

Who Should Use This Calculator?

This calculator is designed for use by healthcare professionals, particularly those working in emergency departments, urgent care settings, or primary care. It is intended to assist in evaluating adult patients who present with symptoms that might suggest a pulmonary embolism (PE), such as unexplained shortness of breath, chest pain, or rapid heart rate.

However, it’s important to note that the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) should only be applied to patients who are already assessed to be at low clinical risk for PE. The calculator helps determine if PE can be ruled out without additional tests. If the patient meets all eight criteria, the chance of PE is considered low enough that further imaging or blood tests might not be needed.

This tool is not intended for use by the general public or for self-diagnosis. It should be used by trained medical professionals who can interpret the results in the context of the patient's overall clinical picture. Using this calculator without appropriate medical knowledge may lead to incorrect conclusions and could delay necessary treatment.

How to Use the PERC Calculator

Using the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) calculator is simple and quick, but it should be done by a healthcare professional who has already determined that the patient is at low clinical risk for pulmonary embolism (PE). The calculator helps confirm whether further testing for PE can be safely avoided.

Follow these steps to use the calculator:

  1. Review the patient’s clinical presentation: Before using the calculator, ensure the patient is considered low risk for PE based on clinical judgment and other assessment tools.
  2. Check each of the eight criteria: For each item, mark the checkbox if the patient meets the criterion. These include factors such as age, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and absence of symptoms or risk factors related to PE.
  3. Click the “Calculate” button: Once you’ve selected all applicable checkboxes, press the "Calculate" button to generate the result.
  4. Interpret the result:
    • If all eight criteria are met (i.e., the score is 8), the patient is considered PERC-negative, meaning their risk of PE is very low and no further PE testing may be needed.
    • If fewer than eight criteria are met, the patient is PERC-positive, and further diagnostic evaluation (such as D-dimer testing or imaging) should be considered.

Criteria Explained

The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) is based on eight clinical criteria that, when all met, suggest a very low likelihood of pulmonary embolism (PE). Here is an explanation of each criterion:

1. Age under 50 years

Patients under the age of 50 are considered at lower risk for PE. Older individuals are at a higher risk due to age-related changes in the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. If the patient is younger than 50, they score positively on this criterion.

2. Pulse rate less than 100/min

A heart rate below 100 beats per minute (bpm) suggests that the patient is not experiencing the tachycardia (rapid heart rate) often associated with PE. A higher pulse rate may indicate a need for further investigation, as it can be a sign of PE or other cardiovascular issues.

3. Oxygen saturation (SaO₂) over 94%

Oxygen saturation above 94% indicates that the patient's lungs are functioning well enough to provide oxygen to the blood. Lower oxygen levels (hypoxemia) may be a sign of PE or other respiratory conditions, suggesting the need for additional testing.

4. No unilateral leg swelling

Unilateral leg swelling, often caused by deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a major risk factor for pulmonary embolism. If the patient does not have swelling in one leg, they are less likely to have a DVT, and thus less likely to have a PE.

5. No coughing up blood (hemoptysis)

Hemoptysis, or coughing up blood, is a concerning symptom that may suggest PE, lung cancer, or other serious conditions. If the patient does not have this symptom, it lowers the suspicion for PE.

6. No recent trauma or surgery

Recent trauma or surgery, particularly within the last four weeks, increases the risk of clot formation, which could lead to a PE. If the patient has not had any such events recently, they are at a lower risk of PE.

7. No prior PE or DVT

A history of previous pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) significantly raises the risk of recurrence. If the patient has no prior history of these conditions, their likelihood of having a PE is lower.

8. Not taking oral estrogen

Oral estrogen (such as in birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy) increases the risk of blood clot formation, which can lead to PE. If the patient is not taking oral estrogen, they are at a lower risk of developing a PE.

Understanding Your Result

After using the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) calculator, the result will help determine whether further testing for pulmonary embolism (PE) is necessary. The result is based on the number of criteria that the patient meets. Here’s how to interpret the outcome:

1. PERC Negative (Score of 8)

If the patient meets all eight criteria (a score of 8), they are considered PERC-negative. This means that the risk of pulmonary embolism is very low, and further testing (such as imaging studies or blood tests) is not typically required. In such cases, healthcare professionals can confidently rule out PE as a cause of the patient’s symptoms.

2. PERC Positive (Score less than 8)

If the patient does not meet all eight criteria (i.e., their score is less than 8), they are considered PERC-positive. This indicates that the likelihood of PE is higher, and further diagnostic evaluation is recommended. In this case, additional tests such as D-dimer levels or imaging studies (e.g., CT pulmonary angiography) may be necessary to confirm or rule out PE.

3. Clinical Judgment

It is important to remember that the PERC calculator is a helpful tool but should not replace clinical judgment. A healthcare professional should always consider the patient’s full medical history, symptoms, and other risk factors before making a final diagnosis. The PERC rule is most effective when used as part of a comprehensive assessment, in combination with other diagnostic tests and clinical evaluation.

4. When to Seek Further Testing

If the result suggests further testing, or if the healthcare provider has any concerns about the patient’s symptoms or medical history, it is crucial to proceed with additional tests. Diagnosing PE early can help prevent serious complications, such as heart failure, lung damage, or even death.

Limitations of the Calculator

While the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) calculator is a valuable tool in assessing the likelihood of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients at low risk, it does have several important limitations that must be considered:

1. Only for Low-Risk Patients

The PERC calculator is designed for use in patients who are already considered to be at low clinical risk for pulmonary embolism. It should not be used on patients with a high pre-test probability of PE, as it may lead to incorrect conclusions. For high-risk patients, more comprehensive diagnostic methods, such as imaging studies or D-dimer testing, are required.

2. Not a Standalone Diagnostic Tool

The PERC calculator is intended to support clinical decision-making but should not be used as a standalone diagnostic tool. It should always be used in conjunction with other clinical assessments, such as the patient's history, physical examination, and other diagnostic tests. A healthcare provider’s judgment is essential when interpreting the results.

3. Exclusion of Certain Risk Factors

The PERC criteria do not account for all possible risk factors for pulmonary embolism. Some patients may have risk factors not covered by the PERC criteria, such as obesity, cancer, or prolonged immobility, that could increase their risk for PE. These factors should be considered separately when evaluating a patient's likelihood of having PE.

4. Limited to Specific Populations

The PERC calculator was primarily validated in adult patients with suspected PE in emergency department settings. Its accuracy and reliability in other populations, such as children, pregnant women, or patients with unusual clinical presentations, have not been extensively studied. In these cases, clinical judgment and additional diagnostic tests are critical.

5. Possible False Negatives

While the PERC calculator helps identify patients with a low probability of PE, there is still a small risk of false negatives. Some patients who meet all eight criteria may still have a pulmonary embolism, though this is relatively rare. For patients with strong clinical suspicion or symptoms that suggest PE, further testing is always recommended, regardless of the PERC score.

6. Does Not Replace Comprehensive Testing

While PERC is helpful in ruling out PE, it does not replace comprehensive diagnostic testing. Imaging tests like CT pulmonary angiography and blood tests such as D-dimer are essential in confirming or ruling out pulmonary embolism in patients who present with symptoms suggesting the condition.

When to Seek Medical Advice

If you are experiencing symptoms such as unexplained shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, or leg swelling, it is important to seek medical advice immediately. These symptoms could indicate a serious condition like pulmonary embolism (PE), which requires prompt medical evaluation and treatment.

1. Symptoms of Pulmonary Embolism

Pulmonary embolism can present with a variety of symptoms, and not all patients will experience the same signs. Common symptoms of PE include:

  • Sudden shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
  • Sharp chest pain that may worsen with deep breaths or coughing
  • Rapid heart rate or palpitations
  • Coughing up blood (hemoptysis)
  • Dizziness or fainting
  • Swelling or pain in one leg, often accompanied by redness or warmth
If you experience any of these symptoms, especially if they come on suddenly, you should seek medical attention right away.

2. Risk Factors for Pulmonary Embolism

Certain risk factors increase the likelihood of developing PE. If you have any of the following risk factors, you should be particularly vigilant and seek medical advice if you experience any related symptoms:

  • Recent surgery or trauma, particularly involving the legs or hips
  • Prolonged immobility, such as being bedridden or sitting for long periods (e.g., during long flights or car rides)
  • Pregnancy or the postpartum period
  • Use of oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy (HRT)
  • History of blood clots, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or previous pulmonary embolism
  • Medical conditions such as cancer, obesity, or heart disease
If you have any of these risk factors, it is essential to monitor your health closely and consult a healthcare provider if you develop symptoms.

3. When to Use the PERC Calculator

The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) calculator is a tool that can help healthcare professionals assess the likelihood of PE in low-risk patients. If your healthcare provider suspects that you might be at low risk for PE, they may use this tool to help guide further testing. However, if you are experiencing symptoms of PE or have a high risk based on your medical history, the PERC calculator is not a substitute for immediate medical attention or further diagnostic tests.

4. Always Seek Professional Medical Help

Even if you believe your symptoms may be mild or unrelated, it is always better to err on the side of caution. Pulmonary embolism can be fatal if not treated promptly, so it is essential to get medical help as soon as possible if you suspect you may have this condition.

Disclaimer

The information provided by the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) calculator is intended for use as a clinical decision-support tool only. It should not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. This calculator is designed to assist healthcare professionals in assessing the likelihood of pulmonary embolism (PE) in low-risk patients but should always be used in conjunction with other clinical evaluations, tests, and patient history.

While the PERC criteria have been validated as a reliable method for ruling out PE in certain cases, no decision tool can replace the expertise of a trained healthcare provider. The accuracy and appropriateness of using the PERC calculator depend on the patient's clinical context, and the tool should be applied only to individuals who are deemed to be at low risk for PE.

The results provided by this calculator are not a definitive diagnosis. In cases where the result suggests a potential risk for PE, further diagnostic testing (such as D-dimer levels, CT pulmonary angiography, or other appropriate imaging tests) may be required to confirm the diagnosis.

The creators and distributors of this calculator do not assume responsibility for any outcomes based on the use of this tool. By using this calculator, users acknowledge that they understand its limitations and agree that it will not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or adverse outcomes resulting from its use.

For any concerns about your health, always consult a qualified healthcare provider to receive a thorough examination and appropriate treatment.

References & Further Reading

  • Goldhaber, S. Z., & Bounameaux, H. (2012). "Pulmonary embolism." The Lancet, 379(9811), 1835-1846.
    A comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of pulmonary embolism.
  • Kearon, C. (2008). "Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism." British Medical Journal, 336, 1142-1146.
    A detailed guide on the management and risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism.
  • Wells, P. S., & Anderson, D. R. (2018). "Pulmonary Embolism: Diagnosis and Management." Cambridge University Press.
    A textbook that provides an in-depth look into diagnostic algorithms, such as the Wells score, and the role of PERC in clinical settings.
  • Raskob, G. E., & Angchaisuksiri, P. (2014). "Venous Thromboembolism: State of the Art." Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 12, 136-145.
    This book discusses the state of the art in thrombosis prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, with a focus on PE.
  • Stein, P. D., & Matta, F. (2009). "Clinical diagnosis of pulmonary embolism." Circulation, 120(24), 2435-2443.
    An overview of clinical and diagnostic approaches for assessing PE, including decision support tools like PERC.